The Dept of Anaesthesia & Intensive Care, CUHK thanks

for an unrestricted education grant
Intensive Care Nephrology - beyond BASIC courses: London (June), Singapore (July)
Click here for details
Asian Intensive Care Conference, Hong Kong, November 21-22nd 2013

Home Feedback Contents

PCI

Up Blood tests ECG PCI Thrombolysis Risk stratification STEMI VSD


 

Percutaneous coronary intervention

STEMI

  • Treatment of choice in hospitals with an experienced team
  • In particular consider acute angioplasty for patients:
    • with contraindications to thrombolysis
    • presenting within 4h of a large anterior MI
    • in whom MI may be due to vein graft occlusion
    • with cardiogenic shock (poor prognosis even when treated with thrombolysis)
  • aim for balloon inflation within 60 minutes of arrival in hospital
  • evidence suggests that in patients presenting to a hospital without the facilities for PCI, transfer to a hospital with the appropriate facilities (including an experienced team) or PCI is associated with a better outcome if transfer can be completed sufficiently rapidly for PCI to start within 2 hours.
  • addition of glycoprotein IIa/IIIb inhibitor (eg abciximab) further reduces mortality
  • unclear whether use of PCI following thrombolysis reduces mortality or recurrent infarction. Thrombolysis following PCI does not reduce infarct size and increases bleeding
  • in patients with cardiogenic shock revascularization (PCI or CABG) results in increased 6 month and 1 year survival although 30 day survival is unaltered

Non-STEMI and unstable angina

Early invasive strategy for:
  • Recurrent angina at rest or low-level activity despite intensive anti-ischaemic therapy
  • Elevated TnT or TnI
  • New or presumed new ST-depression at presentation
  • Recurrent angina/ischaemia with CHF symptoms
  • High-risk findings on non-invasive stress testing
  • Depressed LV function on non-invasive study (ejection fraction<40%)
  • Haemodynamic instability or angina at rest or hypotension
  • Sustained VT
  • Percutaneous coronary intervention within 6 month
  • Prior CABG
  • Repeated admissions for acute coronary syndrome despite therapy without evidence of ongoing ischaemia or high risk
  • Aims:

    • improve prognosis
    • relieve symptoms
    • prevent ischaemic complications
    • improve functional capacity

 

  • Decision regarding choice of revascularization procedure (PCI or CABG) depends on
    • Coronary anatomy
      • CABG is preferred for significant left main stem CAD, and triple vessel disease
    • LV function
      • CABG is often preferred if LV function is abnormal
    • Experience of medical and surgical personnel
    • Co-existing disease
      • Diabetics often require CABG
    • Patient and doctor preferences

Further reading

Fox KAA. Management of acute coronary syndromes: an update. Heart, 2004;90:698-706


©Charles Gomersall, June, 2013 unless otherwise stated. The author, editor and The Chinese University of Hong Kong take no responsibility for any adverse event resulting from the use of this webpage.
Copyright policy    Contributors